Change in Government: Can we make CHANGE part of Government DNA?

 Bill Eggers and John O’Leary write a great post @ Governing about sustainability. I am a huge fan of them both, and especially thank Bill for helping support NASCIO while I was President.

Change in Government: Can we make change part of Government DNA?

Change in Government: Can we make change part of Government DNA?

The post deals with my obsession in Government, sustainability. Not the environmental kind (although I fully support as well) but sustaining government itself. Getting to the core of what we do. Wondering out loud whether we should continue doing everything we do or just some subset. It asks the valid Drucker questions about whether we would start doing this again if we had the choice and if so, from the ground up, how would we do it.

While I believe we need some large scale changes in Government, I was tought by one of my law professors, Jim Jones @ UW Law, that we need to build bridges in society for large scale change. As society needs it, so does Government itself. We need to give civil servants around the world safe spaces and platforms to discuss change in real ways. They will need some processes to deal with the change, internalize it and make it part of their DNA.

And if we are to make it lasting we need to grow some patience. And we need to bridge in some persistence. Change cannot rely on a bright individual every few years to make it happen, it needs to grow in our up and coming leaders, our students and our kids.

Related posts:

The following two tabs change content below.
Matt Miszewski has been a leader of incredible teams, that accomplished unbelievable goals - together. From rebuilding an enterprise technology strategy from the ground up as Chief Information Officer of the State of Wisconsin to driving a struggling global sales and marketing team to live beyond their potential and helping take their stock from $45/sh to over $110/sh, I have been honored to take on huge challenges and beat them by building collaborative and high performing teams. I was proud to be a regular speaker on Digital Realty's earnings call each quarter and being able to brief and advise the Board of Directors each quarter. Focusing on our shareholders needs while coupling that focus with the needs of our top customers was the combination the street was searching for and our increase in equity value proves the effort worthwhile. Our focus on total leasing costs, net present value of long term leases, closing the gap on cash performance and elimination of stagnant inventory helped to drive a stalled stock. Most proud of standing up a revenue engine that will be used for decades including a renewed global salesforce, inside sales expertise, demand generation focus, new global Partners and Alliances program, sales operations team and a heightened focus on connecting lead development to sales outcomes (including a new social marketing program, AR/PR, digital presence, brand identity refresh, SEO/SEM and a regular campaigning process). Combining decades of technology leadership with this commercial success creates an incredible package to unleash revenue and hack growth for companies from any industry out there.

One Response to “Change in Government: Can we make CHANGE part of Government DNA?”

  1. [...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by mattmiszewski, Ulises Muñoz. Ulises Muñoz said: RT @mattmiszewski: Change in Government: Can we make CHANGE part of Government DNA? [...]

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>